Follow by Email

Friday, July 20, 2012

TWINKLE, TWINKLE, LITTLE CABBAGE


The tunes in Book I of my method for string playing, the O’Connor Method, sound simple and charming; one might assume I selected them based on their simplicity and melodic appeal. Yet these tunes are surprisingly sophisticated, and the manner in which they are arranged optimizes the student’s technical development and maximizes his/her emotional engagement with the music.

I will introduce you to a few of these tunes here:

The first tune in the method – and the first tune I ever learned – is the 400 year-old “Boil ‘em Cabbage Down” in A Major. The infectious melody features only four notes, each of which is played over a different chord. The tune remains on one string yet withstands many repeats; moreover, it is inherently open to rhythmic variation, so while I present several such variations in the book, the tune itself “encourages” students to develop their own variations.

The second tune in the method, “Beautiful Skies,” is also in A Major, but its slower tempo, more tranquil mood, and slightly more sophisticated harmonies render it starkly different from “Cabbage.” Also unlike “Cabbage,” “Beautiful Skies” features all notes of the scale and thus introduces the string cross.

A bit later on, the student encounters “Old Joe Clark,” a strong melody that emphasizes the low 2 (natural or flatted played with the 2nd finger) in conjunction with the high 2 on the adjacent string. The modality of this particular tune offers the student to a fresh yet familiar take on American music.

Soon thereafter, the student learns “Boogie Woogie,” another modal tune that emphasizes the low 2 but whose chief function is to make the student feel a strong swing and groove without actually learning how to “swing” (I introduce note-swinging in Book II.). It adheres to a fairly standard blues progression.

The first minor tune in the method is the lyrical “Johnny Has Gone for a Soldier.” The minor key is particularly enthralling to young students, but unfortunately, most violin methods complicate the introduction of the minor key by presenting pieces (typically in D minor or G minor) that require low first finger placement (i.e., a half-step above the open string), which is one of the most frustrating aspects of technical acquisition for beginners. Rather than postpone the introduction of minor to accommodate technical development, I present “Johnny” in F# minor, the relative minor of A Major, a key (and hand shape) with which the student is already familiar. The magic of the key of F# minor, and the relative ease with which “Johnny” can be acquired, softens the transition to, and enhances the anticipation for, D minor and G minor, the next minor keys I introduce in Book II.

As I mentioned earlier, the selection and arrangement of the tunes in Book I is carefully planned. While you and I can appreciate a catchy melodic phrase or an interesting harmony, children respond more naturally to changes: tempo changes, dynamic changes, rhythmic changes, style changes, mood changes. Presenting a series of tunes with similar tempi, moods, etc. would not cultivate versatility or a sense of musical adventurousness – two things so imperative for the modern musician. At the same time, even though Book I features tunes with all manner of tempi, rhythms, and so forth, I ensure that some common threads remain (American music, for instance) so that the transition from one tune to the next is not so jarring as to bewilder or disengage the student.

One unique aspect of these “beginner” tunes is that they are more than suitable for “professional” performance. I recently played “Boil ‘em Cabbage Down” with jazz trumpeter/composer Wynton Marsalis at the Marciac Jazz Festival in France, and the performance received a standing ovation. Last year, I played “Beautiful Skies” at the Blue Note Jazz Club in New York with the great bassist John Patitucci, and the jazz audience absolutely loved it. In American music, there is no need to distinguish – indeed, there is no basis for distinguishing – between “beginner” and “professional” music. Thus, using my method, the young, aspiring performer never feels as though he or she is learning throw-away “bridge” material in order to get better. Every piece is equally valuable and artistically durable.

The vision underlying the O’Connor Method is quite simple: Violin students should learn music that inspires them to play on their own as well. Every minute students practice, they acquire a bit more of the skill required to perform at a high level in any style of music. Parents can only insist their child practice for so long before the child becomes frustrated. But what if the child returns to the violin after finishing dinner and plays voluntarily for a younger sibling, a childhood friend, plays their lesson for the family pet, or sits down to play some tunes outside in the backyard? Then, something magical is at work. The student is no longer merely a lesson-learner; rather, he or she is an active artistic force in their own environment and culture.

My method prepares the student to master any style of music, whether it be jazz, bluegrass, classical, or something else. Already, the method is working for tens of thousands of students around the country.

I invite all string teachers to the Teacher Training sessions for the O’Connor Method. Both Pamela Wiley (a 40-year veteran Suzuki teacher) and I will be leading almost all the courses this year. Our next Teacher Training course will take place at the O’Connor Method Camp in Charleston, SC during the first week of August. We’ll have another course in Ann Arbor, MI later in August and one in Ashokan, NY in September. Others are being scheduled in Los Angeles, New Orleans, and elsewhere in the near future.

I’d love to hear from you!

     -Mark O’Connor

8 comments:

  1. I won't be able to make the teacher training this year because of financial reasons, but fully intend to come next year! I can't wait!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Mark,
    I have been using Books 1 and 2 of your Method since before they were published (!) and the results are excellent! Of course, kids will play what the teacher tells them to, BUT my students really love the repertoire you have put together, they love listening to the CD, AND they inevitably choose your pieces when they perform for friends, for recitals, school talent shows, their father's boss (!!) etc., etc. Those who have returned home to Taiwan or Japan made sure they learned as many pieces as possible before they left! I appreciate the pieces because they were actually written for the violin (as opposed to many of the Suzuki pieces, orginally written for piano, voice, cello, etc.) Therefore, they are truly violinistic, and the children learn them very quickly, and absorb fairly difficult techniques, such as the fast string changes, beautiful smooth legato, and others which you mentioned in your blog. They also are absorbing the different styles, which is so so important.

    Right now I am polishing Book 3, getting ready for next week's workshop in SC. It is challenging to bring pieces up to your swift tempos! But the styles I am learning are just wonderful---it takes careful listening to the CD and trying many times, but---well, we'll see how it goes at the teacher training. After I get qualified for the 3rd book, I shall incorporate it into my teaching---can't wait to hear my students play "Daphne!"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes... regarding the tempos on book III, (since it is intermediate/advanced) I did the accompanying CD at performance tempi... also as you may know, the musical selections make up the content for the professional released CD "American Classics." It was exciting to release Book III as a professional CD for musical and artistic enjoyment as well as it being the music of the Method! This is also one of the hallmarks of the American method - in that repertoire is not necessarily beginning or advanced - there is a bridge... and American musicians have historically crossed that bridge to play with everyone - either on stage or in the living room. That concept begins in Book I as I have illustrated and that you wonderfully comment on here! The tunes are "violinistic" or "string-centric" at the beginning level which is important. You are right to point out that many beginning tunes in Western Classical repertoire were never intended, nor arranged by a violin playing professional or well known string pedagogue. Therefore, the "line" is confusing, saddled with oddly placed string crosses, phrases and not groupings that were designed for the piano or voice as you have commented, and rhythm that is not intuitive to string playing... I spent a lot of time dealing with this aspect of my Method - making sure it is an artistic and holistic musical experience in Book I.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mark, as I spend more and more time teaching from Book 1 I am realizing how much thought and planning you put into the material. Your comments on the difficulties found in western music for the young, beginning violinist are expremely poignant in regards to not just the teaching aspects of the music but to the attachment the music will have to the student who must experience it as they progress from one piece to the next. After spending many years with the Suzuki material, I had gotten "used" to the arrangement of technical challenges found in them. I am now seeing these challenges as un-neccessary hurdles in developing string players. Also, the preponderance of music from the Baroque at the exclusion of other, more friendly styles for the beginning violinist and the absence of steps linking one technical demand with the next seems shortsighted at best. Learning the violin should not have to be any more challenging than it has to be. I remember being a young player who was interested in performing different pieces because I had interest in them and not because of technical challenges. If those pieces I had been interested in could have been arranged to match my developing abilities I would have been a much happier and probably a better violinst for it. Aside from your emphasis on American music, the aspect of your method that first attracted me was its ability to teach creativity through improvisation. Now, as I just talked about, the accessibility of your music as a vehicle to readily teach string technique to beginning string players is more than just valuable, it's fantasic! The more time I spend, the more I see this. Thank you for making Book 1, as you state, "an artistic and holistic musical experience".

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for these comments. I have said, and keep saying that a method is tied to its materials and you give a great illustration why that is. Many have asked me how I narrowed down the repertoire from the perhaps thousands of really good American tunes, to the final sequence I have in the Method. It was something I had been thinking about and putting into practice for decades. A vast amount of criteria was considered. Technical acquisition was paramount as well as reach and historical success of those materials, but very high on that list were beginning tunes that are more accessible to creative concepts. A teacher will notice this once they teach out of the books for a while! Thank you for using the books!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mark, I am comfortable with using your violin method here in Brasilia - Brazil. The students respond very well, also they just love the tunes. Since 2010, when I did my training in NYC that I started using it. The whole idea to be a creative player is, in my opinion the most important aspect of being a musician. That's why I am using your violin method. I look forward to doing the book III training.
    Raimundo Nilton Silva - Brasilia - Brazil.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Mark. I am very comfortable with using your violin method. My students just love the tunes. To be an creative musician is the most important aspect in my opinion and that's why I use your book. I'm glad I got to take the training for books I and II in NYC in 2010. I am looking forward to doing the book III training. Thanks.
    Raimundo Nilton Silva - Brasilia - Brazil.

    ReplyDelete