Follow by Email

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

SUZUKI invented relationship with ALBERT EINSTEIN


On November, 22, 2010, the Telegraph newspaper from the U.K. wrote: 


“Suzuki received the greater part of his formal musical training in Berlin in the 1920s…Unfortunately, Suzuki’s own writings provide little information beyond a couple of famous names and a few anecdotes…

One of the few Germans Suzuki mentions in his recollections is Albert Einstein. By the time Suzuki wrote, Einstein, already famous in the 1920s, had become an icon of the twentieth century and a popular name for any person to link their own with. Suzuki’s relationship with Einstein was surely less intimate than he suggests (Suzuki, 1983, pp. 76-77, 1985a). After all Einstein had a wide circle of friends and acquaintances and spent much time travelling in the 1920s – including a trip to Japan, where he stayed from 17 November to 29 December 1922, returning to Berlin via Palestine in February 1923.

Suzuki relates that he was introduced to Einstein by a Professor Michaelis, who had met Shin’ichi’s father in Nagoya and asked Einstein to act as his “guardian” when he himself accepted an invitation to teach at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.(12)   This account does not square with known facts. The Professor Michaelis in question is the biochemist Leonor Michaelis (1875-1949). After graduating as a medical doctor in Freiburg in 1897, he worked in Berlin. From 1906 to 1922 Michaelis headed the bacteriological department of the City Hospital in Berlin. In 1922 he accepted an invitation to become professor of biochemistry at the Aichi Prefectural Medical College (now the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Nagoya) where he taught until 1926, when he moved to Baltimore. From 1929 to 1940 he worked at the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research in New York (Takeuchi, 1983, p. 437).

Although Michaelis does not usually feature in biographies of Einstein, the Einstein Archives includes a few letters from him, including one Michaelis sent from Baltimore dated 25 January 1927, in which he refers to “my young friend Suzuki-san” who visited Einstein with some of his father’s violins.(13)   Einstein and Michaelis may well have known each other in Berlin and met again during Einstein’s visit to Japan shortly after Michaelis’ arrival in Nagoya.(14)   A letter from Michaelis dated 1931 mentions a visit by Einstein in America where they made music together. According to his daughter Eva, Michaelis was an accomplished pianist and performed publicly during his stay in Nagoya, including in a concert together with Suzuki Shin’ichi on 30 January 1926 (Yagi, 1975, p. ix). Michaelis’ letter suggests that he gave Suzuki an introduction when they met in Nagoya, and that Suzuki subsequently visited Einstein. Einstein gave Suzuki a sketch of himself with the dedication “Herrn Shinichi Suzuki zur freundlichen Erinnerung/Albert Einstein November 1926” (Wartberg, 1999).

…Einstein, moreover, has been cited as an example of the role of music among the German-Jewish bourgeoisie, as has the “the other Einstein,” Alfred, a distant relative and the author of a book on Mozart.” 

--Margaret Mehl, Dr. Phil. (Bonn), Dr. Phil. (Copenhagen) is Associate Professor in the Asian Section of the Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies at the University of Copenhagen

Mehl introduces another “Einstein” in the Suzuki story? Further research reveals a musicologist in 1920s Berlin named “Alfred Einstein” (perhaps no relation or a very distant one to the famous scientist), but someone who befriended Shinichi Suzuki during his stay in Germany. Shinichi Suzuki writes about “Albert Einstein” though, the great physicist in Suzuki’s autobiography, “Nurtured by Love” (1966). Chapter title: “The man Einstein – Dr. Einstein was my guardian”

Suzuki identifies Dr. Einstein, the person who developed the theory of relativity as his “guardian” while in Berlin.

The research of Margaret Mehl says otherwise and additional research corroborates her article.


The following letter from Albert Einstein written to Shinichi Suzuki’s father (obtained from Einstein’s archives) is only one of two documents characterizing a relationship outside of Suzuki's own account? The single letter to Masakichi Suzuki (the father and successful violin maker from Japan) merely mentions Shinichi as one of two brothers coming to see him as salesmen at their father's request. They presented Einstein with a free violin from their father’s violin factory in Japan:
 

 2 November 1926

Dear Mr. Masakichi Suzuki,

Yesterday, your two sons visited my home and showed me four of your wonderful violins. They even invited me to keep one of my choosing as a gift! I currently have two violins made in Berlin, Germany by fine makers and I am very fond of them. I personally compared the tone and responsive qualities one by one to my own instruments.

We even experimented by listening to each instrument from another room as your sons took turns playing them. We all came to the same conclusion that your fine violins were superior to mine!

I would like to express my deep appreciation for this kind and considerate gift and want you to know that I was most surprised by their incredible tone and expert craftsmanship.

 Sincerely,
 Albert Einstein


The 2nd document is an autographed mimeograph of Einstein’s likeness to Shinichi Suzuki apparently upon receipt of the violin as it is dated November, 1926, the very date he received the violin. (see Einstein’s letter above). The autograph says, “Herr Shinichi Suzuki in freundlichsten Erinnerung” translated is, “Mr Shinichi Suzuki in friendliest recollection” - Albert Einstein November 1926

These two documents (the letter to the father and the autograph both from November of 1926) represent the totality of evidence substantiating any meeting between Albert Einstein and Shinichi Suzuki. The two documents also represent the extent of the Einstein relationship on the Suzuki Museum website in Japan (pictured here). http://kinenkan.suzukimethod.or.jp/exhibition.html - Neither the letter or autograph indicate anything other than a cordial meeting. There was nothing alluding to a long-term guardianship or any kind of relationship. For 30 years, from 1926 to the year of Einstein’s death in 1955, there was no correspondence from Einstein to Shinichi Suzuki in either the Einstein archives or those of Suzuki's.

Suzuki’s biography "Nurtured by Love" (translated to English by his wife Waltraud) is recommended reading, sometimes mandatory reading for Suzuki student’s parents in studios and schools across the United States. Millions of parents have read the following words from Shinichi Suzuki:

"Dr. Einstein becomes my guardian. ‘I [Dr. Michaelis] shall no longer be able to look after you, and so I have asked a friend of mine to keep an eye on you.' The friend turned out to be Dr. Albert Einstein, who developed the theory of relativity…I experienced the warm friendship of this world-famous scholar and the outstanding people of his circle. This was one of the most wonderful things that happened to me in my whole life. It provided in later years the conviction and basic theory behind the driving force that enabled me to carry out without the slightest doubt my Talent Education movement for small children. My contact with the greatness of Dr. Einstein as a man...Often when there was a good concert, Dr. Einstein would telephone me and say, "I have tickets, so let's go... even though I was a mere stripling, he had invited me as his guest..."

"Stripling," an adolescent? In 1926, Shinichi Suzuki was at least 28 years-old. Albert Einstein 47. Quote from the Suzuki biography: "Suzuki the Man"

“During this time when Suzuki was with Einstein, the scientist would frequently take Suzuki to concerts....it was an exhilarating experience for Suzuki to associate with people of such high intellect.”

Quote from Chapter 9, Meeting Albert Einstein - “Vehicle of Music”

“Dr. Einstein also played the violin quite well. His touch was soft, light, and smooth. Indeed Shinichi thought that Dr. Einstein played much better than he himself. Before Dr. Michaels left for the United States, he asked Dr. Einstein to take care of Shinichi for him."


Berlin Musicologist “Alfred” Einstein (not the physicist) reportedly knew Suzuki. From Alfred Einstein's bio on amazines.com

Alfred Einstein” (Dec 30, 1880 – Feb 13, 1952) was a German-American musicologist and music editor. He was noted as one of the widest-ranging music historians in the first half of the 20th century. (Alfred) influenced Shinichi Suzuki (an amateur violinist visiting Berlin from Japan, and inventor of the Suzuki method of early learning).” --amazines.com
"At age 22, Suzuki traveled to Germany to find a violin teacher to continue his studies. While there, he studied privately with Karl Klingler, but did not receive any formal degree past his high school diploma. He met and became friends with Alfred Einstein, who encouraged him in learning classical music. He also met, courted, and married his wife, Waltraud." --Quoted from Findtarget.com

"Did not receive any formal degree past his high school diploma" raises the question of Suzuki's PhD? Why does he refer to himself as “Dr. Suzuki" in his biographies for Western audiences? An answer comes from one of his top biographers and surrogates who printed her reasoning on the Suzuki Association of the Americas website:

“Suzuki was awarded several honorary doctorates in the US as well as numerous other awards. He therefore used the title ‘Dr’ as would any recipient of an honorary degree.” –Lois Shepheard (Suzuki biographer and author of “memories of Dr. Shinichi Suzuki – Son of His Environment)

In her “History of the Suzuki Method” by Pam Werner cites “Alfred” Einstein but does not reference the great scientist: 
“Dr. Shinichi Suzuki was the founder of the worldwide music education movement known as the Suzuki Method. Born in Nagoya, Japan in 1898, he was the son of Japan's first and largest violin manufacturer…at the age of 22, traveled to Berlin to study with the renowned violinist, Karl Klinger. It was here in Germany that Suzuki became a friend of Alfred Einstein and through him, associated with many of the world's leading artists and thinkers. Suzuki met and married Waltraud Prange, a concert soprano and they returned to Japan in 1928 where he began teaching and performing with the Suzuki Quartet.” http://www.soundpiper.com/mln/methods.htm
The following is excerpted from an “official Suzuki bio.” The general language and information is nearly the same as Werner’s, except for the name change from “Alfred” to “Albert Einstein.” Excerpt of Suzuki bio from:
"Born in Nagoya, Japan in 1898, Shinichi Suzuki was surrounded by the sound of violins at his father’s violin making factory. As one of seven children, Shinichi spent his childhood not learning how to play the violin, but working at the factory putting up violin soundposts. A family friend encouraged Shinichi to study Western culture, but his father felt that it was beneath his son's station in life to become a performer. It wasn’t until the age of 17 that he began to teach himself how to play the violin, after becoming inspired by a recording of Mischa Elman. Without access to professional instruction, he would listen to recordings and try to imitate what he heard.
At the age of 22, Shinichi persuaded his father to allow him to study in Germany, where Karl Klingler eventually became his private violin teacher. Shinichi never attained any formal education past his high school diploma. While in Germany, he spent several years under the guardianship of Albert Einstein. He also met, courted, and married his wife, Waltraud. Upon his return to Japan, he formed a string quartet with his brothers and began teaching at the Imperial School of Music and at the Kunitachi Music School in Tokyo. During World War II, his father’s violin factory was bombed by American war planes and Shinichi lost one of his brothers. The family was also left penniless and Shinichi decided to leave his teaching positions and move to a nearby city where he constructed parts for wooden airplanes to raise some money. Poor and hungry, at one point almost dying, he began to teach violin lessons to the orphan children in the outer cities where he lived. He adopted an orphan boy, Matsui, and started to develop teaching strategies and philosophies. Shinichi combined his new practical teaching applications with traditional Asian philosophy." http://www.istitutosuzukiitalia.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&lang=en

Other than what Suzuki told his biographers, there is no independent corroboration of any relationship between Albert Einstein and Shinichi Suzuki beyond that of the violin salesman for that one day in November 1926? The mentorship that the 28 year-old violin student Shinichi Suzuki received from the great scientist was singled out and utilized in selling Suzuki and his method to the U.S.A., extolling his philosophical capacity and dramatically elevating his intellectual credentials to both American academics and to the American public. He was positioned as a "great man" in those capacities, adding the title of "Doctor" to his name, bringing further distinction. He titled himself "Dr. Suzuki" in English translations, just the way he referred to the accomplished academics in Germany that he purported to associate with (ie: "Dr. Einstein"). His own violin reputation as a player was considered of mediocre quality by most and there were no feature LPs released commercially of his playing. As a teacher he was unknown to the West. American enterprises organized and marketed "Dr. Suzuki" to the U.S. as a great man, philosopher and intellectual from Japan, with his pedigree from 1920s Berlin.


Regarding some of the additional information provided here by Suzuki accounting for his time during WWII; “making wooden airplanes” and “he began to teach violin lessons to the orphan children in the outer cities where he lived." According to Japanese legend and tradition, Emperor Hirohito was directly descended from the "Sun God," and he was also a totalitarian dictator. The Emperor's Imperial Japanese Army needed about every able-bodied man they had to defend their country, suffering the loss of three million Japanese people in the war. Shinichi's father’s violin factory was turned into a factory for warplane parts. "My father had converted the violin factory to make seaplane floats." -Suzuki (Nurtured by Love). He lost one brother in the war and he accounts that his father died in 1944. According to historian David Powers of the BBC;


“They (Japanese citizens) were indoctrinated from an early age to revere the Emperor as a living deity, and to see war as an act that could purify the self, the nation, and ultimately the whole world. Within this framework, the supreme sacrifice of life itself was regarded as the purest of accomplishments.” 

According 1.JMA, “The Imperial Japanese Army in the Second World War"
“In 1945 fully 87% of the total adult (both male and female) population of Japan was drafted into either industry or the military. 50% of that total made up the Reserve army on the home islands. This raised the total in the army to 5.5 million troops. Though for these new troops basic training lasted only from four to six weeks at most. And these new troops were usually only trained in rudimentary infantry skills. Japan was no longer able to effectively train replacements in the more technically skilled positions required.”

From an online forum: "In 1941, Suzuki was an able-bodied 43 year-old man when the Emperor's Imperial Japanese Army invaded the United States. Being a Japanese person, there was really no such thing as a conscience objector because of the obedience and allegiance to their Emperor. Suicide or execution was likely for those who objected to the War effort. Certainly Suzuki's description of himself hiding in the mountains for years so he could look better to the U.S., is not plausible and the veracity in unfortunate, similar to many other claims he continued to make. Suzuki's ethics of “beautiful heart” and “good citizen” developed in the WWII era as a philosophy for his Method, were likely meant only for young Japanese children and their Emperor, not for children in the West." 

With all of the new research that has come to our attention, we discovered this little twist; Waltraud Suzuki’s brother was named "Albert" and the publishing company who eventually owned the Suzuki Method in the U.S. was "Alfred Publishing."


 



Sunday, April 21, 2013

Suzuki Biographer Sets Me Straight


I was misquoted on the Suzuki Association of the Americas website this week in Lois Shepheard’s article: "Response to Mark O’Connor’s ‘Say It Ain’t So, Shin’ichi Suzuki." The effort was to set me straight on things...but let’s take a closer look at what she wrote. It was remarkable.
 

Lois Shepheard, a biographer of Shinichi Suzuki, rebuts my blog regarding Suzuki’s veracity. I used quotes by researchers and their preliminary fact findings. Most of the quotes that Mrs. Shepheard had a problem with from my blog, are not mine at all. I don’t even know enough about some of those specific findings to even have an opinion on it other than just offering it as initial inquiry. I had clearly quoted some Facebook posts by two researchers, who were preliminarily looking into some of these questions. Each quote had quotation marks and the authorship of those quotes were obvious.


Since Ms. Shepheard’s article regarding my blog has gotten a lot of attention, I would rather not have people attribute quotes by someone else to me. However after reading her article and her responses to the questions in my blog, she raised even more questions than her supply of answers. Since Mrs. Shepheard was one of Suzuki’s top biographers (as she states below), it poses yet another question: There are so many authorized biographies written by Shinichi Suzuki's associates, where Suzuki himself is nearly the sole source and contributor of all factual information, consequently, they are all very similar to each other. I don’t know of any other example when someone authorized his surrogates to write the many biographies that Suzuki did, essentially producing the same general content about his life. With nearly no fact checking, all of these biographies count on Suzuki as the sole source of the information and it contains historically important people, places and events.
In the end, there are numerous biographies about Suzuki, all written without any objectivity, nor offering any criticism of the man. Just 100% of what Suzuki wanted people to know about him, as well as the desires of his most devoted associates writing the biographies.

 

My response here addresses the points that Mrs. Shepheard directed towards me in her article for the Suzuki Association. I want to clear my name from quotes that she wrongly attributed to me and criticized me for, as well as comment on her answers that seemed at least to me, to raise even more questions.

 

LS: “Since questions are raised in his blog, I’m happy to comment. I’m probably as qualified as anyone to answer queries about the Suzuki Method. In order to really assess it, I made repeated trips to Japan, studied with Dr Suzuki and got to know him, learned to speak and read Japanese, had discussions with and observed various teachers around the world, read some of Dr Suzuki’s texts in Japanese as well as their English translations—and taught the method….An announcement he [O'Connor] made on the Internet in 2009 said he was producing a ‘Suzuki-inspired series’ of books. I’m sorry that something which inspired him then, fills him with such disillusionment four years later.”

 

MOC Response: I have never said my Method was inspired by Suzuki. Perhaps a journalist said that, but once again those are not my words. I was inspired to author a Violin Method from experiences with countless music students, American music, traditions, styles, diversity, community, creativity, great technique, my work with high-level colleagues, my teachers, my mentors and heroes, my summer string camps, traveling around the country holding classes and workshops, having private students, teaching at conservatories, experiences with members of my own family taking Suzuki violin lessons, being a composer in classical music, an improviser and performing with hundreds of symphony orchestras, my association with some of the top classical musicians of our time and my own success in music and having a music career. I have personally taught tens of thousands of students – thousands of students in my own string camps alone. I authored an American music violin method and learning philosophy for music students that addresses the 21st century, while including music from all of the important violin eras.

 

American music over the last century, has become the most loved music across the world. There is a real attraction of American music to kids and to adults all over the world and I am an expert and leader in American music on the violin. I also was inclined to create a Violin Method because string instruments over the last 50 years have declined in our culture in every way - in quality, creativity, literature, super-star classical soloists, relevance to our time and its footing in public, private schools and in universities. Suzuki students are quitting the violin at unprecedented rates these days, at 6 years-old, 8 years-old, at 12, at 15, and at 18 years-old, the attrition has been extraordinary. This is taking place at the exact time where we have too many qualified orchestra players for available positions in orchestras. So I thought I should do something about it. I came forward with “A New American School Of String Playing” and the “O’Connor Method.”

 

LS: “At first I, too, made the mistake of thinking Dr Suzuki was all about selling violins. In fact when I first met him in 1967 at a seminar in Manhattan, I told him we couldn’t get very small violins in Melbourne, Australia. He looked at me with no comprehension of the subject. (For Suzuki’s absolute lack of business acumen, see my book p.28, 48-52). Actually, when you think about it, would it have been so very bad if he had been trying to sell violins?”

 

MOC Response: Of course it is not bad to sell his family’s violins. Shinichi Suzuki went away to a business school in Japan as a teenager, and he was being groomed to run the family's violin factory. He did sell his Method all around the world and helped establish many of the various associations and chapters. He also organized to have more biographies done on his life than any other musician I know of! This all ads up to being a pretty astute business man, someone who knows how to sell their products certainly. This is fine. Being a good salesman is fine. My problem with it is false marketing and putting quotes and words into famous people’s mouths in order to sell your products. Even inventing significant relationships to beef up his credentials so to have people buy into his teaching philosophy in the West. There is an ethical issue there.

 

LS: “The use of the word ‘guardian’ to describe Einstein’s relationship with Suzuki in Suzuki’s own book Nurtured by Love, and to which Mr O’Connor objects, is one selected by his German wife as she translated from Japanese to English. It could equally have been translated as ‘protector’ which may have had a different implication?”

 

MOC Response: Is this is a question, from Suzuki’s biographer? Regardless if it is “guardian” that Waltraud wrote and that Suzuki approved of, or if it was “protector” as Mrs. Shepheard openly ponders, there is no proof that there was any such relationship. The only autograph or anything that Suzuki possessed from Einstein was an autograph inscription characterizing a cordial greeting regarding the gift of the violin from Masakichi Suzuki in 1926. Einstein was an extremely important man in the 1920s, already responsible for many scientific breakthroughs (despite what was asserted by Mrs. Shepheard) and there would be no obvious reason for him to give his attention to a 28 year-old amateur violin student from Japan, when Einstein hung around with the likes of Fritz Kreisler for his violin-playing company. By Suzuki’s own admission, he was horrible with the German language at that time, so they would not have been able to communicate on any deep intellectual or philosophical level – whatsoever. Also, it is strange that “Alfred Einstein” is never mentioned in any of Suzuki’s biographies. "Alfred," a musicologist, claimed they were friends (no relation to the famous scientist). For being Suzuki’s “protector” it is certainly odd that there was no correspondence for the following 30 years (1926 to 1955) until Einstein's death. All correspondence from Einstein was documented. Did they have a falling out? (mentor and protégé) Or is it obvious that they simply never had a relationship to begin with?

 

LS: “Mr O’Connor objects to Suzuki using the title ‘Doctor’. Suzuki was awarded several honorary doctorates in the US as well as numerous other awards. He therefore used the title ‘Dr’ as would any recipient of an honorary degree. (See p.1 of my book.) All these awards, medals, certificates, plaques etc. are on display at the Suzuki Museum in Matsumoto, Japan.”

 

MOC Response: I have never heard of anyone in music education who titled themselves “doctor” solely based on an honorary degree. I have an honorary doctorate and don’t refer to myself as "Dr." O’Connor. To ask academic PhD’s who've earned theirs at the university for eight years, to refer to you as "Dr. Suzuki," seems very strange and shows a certain kind of character trait. You can do it I suppose. I could do it perhaps. But it goes to that “salesman” characterization notion, really selling yourself. Or it is the feeling of wanting privilege, being emboldened - I don’t know. It is highly unusual in education circles certainly. Suzuki approved of the title because he himself called his own heroes those titles of “Dr. Michaelis” and “Dr. Einstein” in his autobiography “Nurtured by Love.” So he knew exactly what the title meant as he identified Einstein with the same. Suzuki thought that he deserved to have the same title as them, even though Suzuki’s, like mine, was a honorary degree.

 

LS: “I’m not quite sure what Mr O’Connor means by Shinichi Suzuki’s ‘supposed relationship with Klingler’. There is no doubt that he studied with Karl Klingler. I met Karl Klingler’s daughter, Marianne, in Germany (in Ingolstadt) in the early 1980’s. She had stories of her father’s association with Suzuki. (She also wanted me to relocate to Germany and teach the Suzuki Method there.) Mr O’Connor doubts that Klingler took a young Suzuki on as a pupil and no others at the time as stated by Suzuki. However, this is quite likely. There is no doubt that Klingler was a reluctant teacher (p, 251 ‘Memoirs’ by Carl Flesch. Also explained in my book, p.10).”

 

MOC Response: “Young Suzuki?” He would have been in his mid 20s. Once again, this was a quote from one of the researchers, not from me. They were not my words. I never said that Suzuki didn’t take lessons with Klingler. But since Mrs. Shepheard brings it up, it does seem unlikely that any violinist in his mid 20s like Suzuki was, with a mid level or mediocre violin talent and with no hope for a professional concert career, could ever be taught eight years of private lessons by a world-class violin professor like Karl Klingler. I think that would be hard to imagine for most anyone. Klingler was the former concertmaster of the Berlin Philharmonic, was the former 2nd violinist in the iconic Joseph Joachim’s String Quartet (the violinist who premiered the Brahms Violin Concerto and worked with Brahms on editing the entire solo). Klingler was wealthy and he taught violin prodigies in addition to the conservatory students in Berlin

 

This is some very high-level music circles there in Berlin. Suzuki could not play at this level. Suzuki never released a professional recording which is proof that there was not a big enough talent as a violinist. This association to Klingler probably deserves some looking into. The daughter and/or heirs who run Klingler’s online archives, does not mention Suzuki. If Suzuki invented the Einstein relationship, why not stretch the association with Klingler some to beef up more credentials? For teachers and scholars in the West, the folks that he was selling his materials to, eight years of study with the top violin teacher in Berlin sounds better than two years… or it sounds better than just taking a summer course in Berlin?

 

LS: “Yes, there is something wrong with the dates of building the S.S.Hakone and the dates Suzuki is said to have sailed on it, if they are as Mark O’Connor says. This merely proves that the dates are muddled, not that Suzuki didn’t go to Germany. Don’t forget that there is sometimes confusion about calculation of Japanese dates. Until very recently, years were numbered in the era of each emperor. As late as the 1980’s in Matsumoto I found documents numbered in the Showa Era – counting from the time of Emperor Hirohito, so starting in 1926 as Year 1. I have a magazine from (Suzuki) Talent Education, marked ’75 on the cover. (I used to subscribe to this magazine.) Though it was printed in 1975, the centre pages with pictures of famous people and events are all captioned with the Showa era dates. Pictures show various musicians with Dr Suzuki and/or Japanese children in Japan, generally in Matsumoto. They include Walter Gieseking, Arthur Grumiaux, Paul Badura-Skoda, Mstislav Rostrapovitch, Pablo Casals, David Oistrakh, Yehudi Menuhin, Marcel Moyse, Leonard Kogan, William Primrose, I Musici. Other pictures are of Suzuki receiving the Ysaye Medal, the honorary qualification at the University of Rochester at Eastman, and from New England Conservatory and holding the medal of the 3rd Order of the Sacred Treasure in Japan.”

 

MOC Response: Regarding photographs with famous people – many ordinary citizens have pictures with stars – this does not mean the famous endorsed the work of these individuals! I have a picture with every President of the United States during my entire adult life, but that does not mean that those leaders endorsed my Method! The date of the voyage from Japan for Suzuki was very specific and it was written in the day, month and year of the Western calendar date, (not the Emperor’s calendar). But this goes to a bigger problem. The reason why he may have messed up the date is exactly what Mrs. Shepheard hinted at. He might not have gone to Germany any where near that time period, therefore did not study with Klingler for eight years?

 

Suzuki talks about how he was mentored by well-known Berlin scientist Dr. Michaelis. By reading Suzuki’s own words in his biographies, we assume he is talking about being mentored by Michaelis in Berlin. But that is impossible. Dr. Michaelis was living in Japan for four years while Suzuki claims to have been in Berlin. Dr. Michaelis lived in Japan between 1922 – 1926 after which he came to John Hopkins University and resided in America from 1926 forward. The only place that Michaelis could have become a "mentor" to Shinichi was in Japan, not Berlin. Suzuki writes or recalls in all of his biographies about this kind of hand-off from Michaelis to Einstein in 1926 as to who "looked after" him. First of all, Shinichi was 28 years-old, hardly needing someone to look after him you would think, especially if he already lived in Berlin for 6 years like he claims. But Michaelis could not have “looked after” Shinichi from 1922 to 1926 since he was in Japan as was the entire Michaelis family. The records are clear on that.

 

LS: “Mr O’Connor should note that I included the picture of Casals in the above list. It is not the only one in existence. There is another in one of the Talent Education magazines, for a start. I have an audio tape of Casals’ speech in 1961 in Matsumoto (see my book p.114). The tape begins with a performance by a group of ‘cellists and one by a group of violin students. Casals sobs and is comforted in Spanish by his wife. He then speaks in English to the audience. The film of this event was shown at the 16th Suzuki Method World Convention in Matsumoto last month (March 2013). Therefore Mr O’Connor’s fears that a meeting between Suzuki and Casals never took place are groundless.

 

MOC Response: Once again, this was not my quote. I never said that that Casals and Suzuki didn’t "meet." The researcher that I quoted was speaking about an event in Tokyo that Suzuki uses in his marketing materials - a Tokyo event where this meeting took place. Now Mrs. Shepheard says that there is a speech by Pablo Casals in “Matsumoto” that she has a recording of. That is not what it says on the cover of Suzuki’s “Nurtured by Love,” it clearly says Tokyo. So like the date of the ship to Berlin that didn’t exist, there is a problem with the city this took place in. I read where it could have been in Kyoto as well, but it was likely just one of these cities.

What is extremely important in all of this is not a quick photo op, but what Casals said in that speech as well as Suzuki’s characterization of Casals’ actions - all of which are completely chronicled by Suzuki himself. I would think it would be difficult for any teacher in 1961 to describe meeting a world-wide celebrity and iconic musician such as Casals, where he claimed that he “wept on my shoulder” over how good his students were! It not only seems like a real stretch, but to claim it and put it in print, without any other person witnessing it or characterizing it from a more objective standpoint, is yet another issue as I see it. I know how these things work as I am around very famous musicians all the time. This is not something that passes the smell test let's say.

 

Would Mrs. Shepheard share the audio and video with us at least? She says she has a copy of it. If she could put it up on a MP3, YouTube, Soundcloud or another way so we could hear his English. What is perplexing to us, is that Suzuki’s transcription of the Casals’ speech (in Tokyo, Matsumoto or Kyoto) does not sound like Casals' English. It sounds like the English was transcribed to Japanese by Shinichi himself. Then his wife Waltraub, a German having never lived in an English speaking country, translates Casals speech back into English again for the Suzuki biographies. For a universally important figure such as Pablo Casals, that is a lot of translation to endure and potentially subjective translation at that. What we don’t know at all from the Casals speech, is if there was anything like an endorsement of the Suzuki Method or his philosophy of teaching music contained in it. Casals' endorsement was used heavily in the marketing of the Suzuki Method to the West in the 1970s, and Casals died in 1973.

 

LS: “The word ‘Suzuki’ in regard to Dr Suzuki’s teaching is not a ‘brand’. It is a philosophy of education.”

 

MOC Response: OK.

 

LS: “I am interested to read that Mark O’Connor’s method becomes as he says: ‘more successful, more mainstream, and more clearly FUN.’ That’s great; he is to be congratulated. I’m not decrying the importance of a musician such as Mark O’Connor, but I’m not sure that his successful American-themed method can be compared with that of a world-wide Suzuki Method, over so many decades. (Last month’s convention in Matsumoto had over 5,000 families from 36 countries. The bookings for places at the convention closed after three days, when all classes had already filled.)”

 

MOC Response: I did not say these words that Mrs. Shepheard quotes. That was a quote from someone else, and it was quoted in my blog with its author printed clearly. I don’t think there is any dispute from me as to how famous and widely used the Suzuki Method is. I have said several times that Suzuki has a monopoly in most of the U.S.

 

LS: “The letter from Einstein, written at the end of 1926 and quoted by Mr O’Connor does not, as Mr O’Connor states, prove that Shinichi Suzuki was one of the two Japanese men who gave Einstein a violin and that it was Shinichi’s only contact with Einstein.”

 

MOC Response: If this is the only letter from Einstein that mentions Shinichi Suzuki’s name, referring to him in the capacity of a salesman, and no other correspondence took place whatsoever, all the way up until 1955, (the year Einstein died), did Einstein not even care what happened to his “protégé” during WWII? It does not look like there was any kind of relationship, especially if Mrs. Shepheard, one of Suzuki's biographers, can’t provide anything more other than to guess and assume that Suzuki told the truth about it.

 

LS: “Shinichi had six brothers, some of them violin makers. In 1926, Shinichi had already been in Germany for some years. We can therefore assume that two of his brothers brought the selection of violins from Japan. I guess we can also presume that if Masakichi Suzuki wanted to give Einstein a violin, it was for a reason. Perhaps to thank him for helping Shinichi? Certainly at the end of 1926, a Japanese violin maker wouldn’t, out of the blue, have sent violins to a scientist in Germany who in 1922 first published ‘The Meaning of Relativity’. If he had heard of him at all, how would Masakichi have even guessed that the scientist dabbled in violin playing?”

 

MOC Response: Mrs. Shepheard is guessing, assuming, asking questions. Asking me questions? Here is my logic since she is asking the question. If the 1926 gift of the violin from the Suzuki father (Masakichi Suzuki to Einstein) was to thank Einstein for taking care of Shinichi, then Shinichi Suzuki is incorrect in his biographies. Shinichi says clearly that Dr. Michaelis was moving to the U.S. to work at John Hopkins in 1926 and that is when Michaelis "introduces" Shinichi to Einstein and passes Suzuki to him (so to speak) for Einstein to “look after.” The dates don’t square, they are off by years.

 

Secondly, if Einstein was receiving a gift from the father, Masakichi Suzuki, to thank him for him taking care of his son Shinichi, then there would have been a reference to that relationship in the letter to the father or on the autographed picture to Shinichi. Why didn't Einstein acknowledge Shinichi, that he has been a good young man to "look after" and nice to be around etc. etc…but he didn't allude to it at all! There is only the “nice to meet you autograph” Einstein inscribed to Shinichi. Also, if Shinichi was already in Berlin, Mrs. Shepheard is surmising that another two Suzuki sons delivered the violin to Einstein, while Shinichi who was living locally was not invited to help Einstein choose the violin? That is not plausible. It is obvious that Mrs. Shepheard does not know unfortunately. After all of her research and being his biographer, she still has only Shinichi Suzuki’s word on it, and like me and now many people, are only left to ask questions. In the end, I am afraid it is exactly what it appears to be. That these stories were made up to sell himself to the West, because he had no academic credentials and no success as a musician, artist or writer to stand behind.

 

LS: “I am interested that Mr O’Connor heard about ‘mentorship’ that Suzuki received from Einstein and put forward as ‘dramatically elevating his (Suzuki’s) intellectual credentials’. I would query that too! I have not heard this as a major item toward Suzuki becoming a ‘great man’. Note that in ‘Nurtured by Love’, a book of 121 pages, Einstein is mentioned on only four pages.”

 

MOC Response: That was four pages too many it looks like! If this is invented, there are serious issues about the length he would go to sell himself as an intellectual and philosopher heavyweight since he was not a good violinist. He needed to beef up some credentials to sell his “philosophy” to the West and that begins to look more and more like the case, especially if I am on a back and forth with one of his biographers here who knew him the most, and she is asking the questions? This is a screen shot of an entire page of the official http://kinenkan.suzukimethod.or.jp/exhibition.html. On the Suzuki mementos page in Japan, they have Einstein all across it:

 

LS: “‘Nurtured by Love’ was written only by Shinichi Suzuki, not in collaboration with his wife, Waltraud, as Mr O’Connor states. Waltraud translated it. (See my book p.54)”

 

MOC Response: OK

 

LS: “Mr O’Connor wonders whether Suzuki’s ethics of training a ‘beautiful heart’ and ‘good citizen’ are appropriate to American children, then states quite categorically that such ethics were not needed. He suggests that Dr Suzuki did find these aims necessary in a country ruled by an ‘Emperor as their dictator’. Not so; since about three quarters of the way through the 19th century, Japan has had a Western-style government. The Imperial family is a figurehead, much like the British royal family.”

 

MOC Response. According to many of Suzuki’s biographies and SAA’s own materials, he started to develop his Method and Philosophy in the 1930s and 1940s and put it into practice. The “good citizen” always jumped out at me frankly. Americans especially during Shinichi Suzuki’s lifetime, have been great citizens. America and its allies saved the world twice during Suzuki’s life, maybe three times. The allies were the good citizens, and it is a bizarre twist that the “good citizen” message is coming from someone who stayed in Japan to support his Emperor and his invading army in 1941. The Suzuki’s fought Americans, turned their violin factory into one to build parts for war planes...One of his brothers was killed in the war evidently. He didn’t defect like his hero Einstein did to the West, the great philosopher. All very interesting. 

 

According to Suzuki’s biographies, one story that he claims during the years 1941 – 1945 was that he got a 2 year-long stomach virus that put him out until he got some Chinese herbal medicine that finally cured it. He also claims in some biographies that he hid out in the mountainous regions of Japan, living off the grid, resorting to eating pond scum to stay alive at times. Another biography suggests that he was actually teaching violin to kids during the war. Hard to imagine an able bodied 43 year-old Japanese man who was not drafted in the defense of their country, much like the other men in his family was. Hard to imagine that someone could hide out in the mountains while his German wife was in a Japanese internment camp, all without getting tracked down in that militaristic, totalitarian government? It all seems like a stretch. It sounds like they are covering up what he was actually doing during the war, an image makeover of sorts, so they could make a better sale of his Method to regular middle American folks back in the 1950s and 1960s.

 

LS: “And actually, I don’t know of any country in the world that doesn’t need good citizens.”

 

MOC Response: We certainly don’t need a Suzuki violin method to show children around the world to be good citizens, especially American citizens, but it is a nice ethic. Music and the arts of any kind, helps to make good people. There is nothing about the Suzuki system that creates better citizens over and above African American music, Native American music, Latino music etc. 

 

Lois Shepheard. Melbourne, Australia. Apr 18, 2013